Our blogger you get the free items with any download problems. we update the blogger on the daily basis and upload the new items on the bloggers.
IN this pages get the items for your minds and your get free items and others many sames things in this pages, so your find the items and enjoy the life
Common
Size Financial Statements
Common size ratios are used to compare financial statements of
different-size companies, or of the same company over different periods. By
expressing the items in proportion to some size-related measure, standardized
financial statements can be created, revealing trends and providing insight
into how the different companies compare.
The common size ratio for each line
on the financial statement is calculated as follows:
Common Size Ratio
|
=
|
|
For example, if the item of interest
is inventory and it is referenced to total assets (as it normally would be),
the common size ratio would be:
Common Size Ratio for Inventory
|
=
|
|
The ratios often are expressed as
percentages of the reference amount. Common size statements usually are
prepared for the income statement and balance sheet, expressing information as
follows:
- Income statement items - expressed as a percentage of
total revenue
- Balance sheet items - expressed as a percentage of
total assets
The following example income
statement shows both the dollar amounts and the common size ratios:
Common Size Income Statement
Income
Statement
|
Common-Size
Income Statement |
|
Revenue
|
70,134
|
100%
|
Cost of Goods
Sold
|
44,221
|
63.1%
|
Gross Profit
|
25,913
|
36.9%
|
SG&A Expense
|
13,531
|
19.3%
|
Operating Income
|
12,382
|
17.7%
|
Interest Expense
|
2,862
|
4.1%
|
Provision for Taxes
|
3,766
|
5.4%
|
Net Income
|
5,754
|
8.2%
|
For the balance sheet, the common
size percentages are referenced to the total assets. The following sample
balance sheet shows both the dollar amounts and the common size ratios:
Common Size Balance Sheet
Balance
Sheet
|
Common-Size
Balance Sheet |
|
ASSETS
|
||
Cash & Marketable Securities
|
6,029
|
15.1%
|
Accounts Receivable
|
14,378
|
36.0%
|
Inventory
|
17,136
|
42.9%
|
Total Current Assets
|
37,543
|
93.9%
|
Property, Plant, & Equipment
|
2,442
|
6.1%
|
Total Assets
|
39,985
|
100%
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||
Current Liabilities
|
14,251
|
35.6%
|
Long-Term Debt
|
12,624
|
31.6%
|
Total Liabilities
|
26,875
|
67.2%
|
Shareholders' Equity
|
13,110
|
32.8%
|
Total Liabilities & Equity
|
39,985
|
100%
|
The above common size statements are
prepared in a vertical analysis, referencing each line on the financial
statement to a total value on the statement in a given period.
The ratios in common size statements
tend to have less variation than the absolute values themselves, and trends in
the ratios can reveal important changes in the business. Historical comparisons
can be made in a time-series analysis to identify such trends.
Common size financial statements can
be used to compare multiple companies at the same point in time. A common-size
analysis is especially useful when comparing companies of different sizes. It
often is insightful to compare a firm to the best performing firm in its
industry (benchmarking). A firm also can be compared to its industry as a
whole. To compare to the industry, the ratios are calculated for each firm in
the industry and an average for the industry is calculated. Comparative
statements then may be constructed with the company of interest in one column
and the industry averages in another. The result is a quick overview of where
the firm stands in the industry with respect to key items on the financial
statements.
Limitations
As with financial statements in
general, the interpretation of common size statements is subject to many of the
limitations in the accounting data used to construct them.
- Different accounting policies may be used by different
firms or within the same firm at different points in time. Adjustments
should be made for such differences.
- Different firms may use different accounting calendars,
so the accounting periods may not be directly comparable.
No comments:
Post a Comment